[November 8 update: Today, Douglas Massey, a Princeton social scientist, offers his take on the outcome of the election, including these remarks:
Trump’s campaign was openly racist, xenophobic and authoritarian and his supporters appear to be willing to jettison democracy in support of an autocratic demagogue who promises to “fix everything” while pandering to their angers, resentments and prejudices.
Also today, Ezra Klein offers thoughts on how Democrats might respond to the results:
Emotionally, there are two ways Democrats can respond: contempt or curiosity. I’ve seen plenty of contempt already. If Americans are still willing to vote for Trump, given all he’s said and done, then there’s nothing Democrats or Harris could have done to dissuade them. There’ll be a desire to retreat, to hunker down, to draw the boundaries of who is decent and who is deplorable ever more clearly.
Essentially, in my post yesterday (which follows), I sought to push back against a Democratic response that wrote off Trump voters as beyond the pale. While Trump voters "appear to be willing to jettison democracy," in my mind a small, but significant slice of the Trump majority voted for an authoritarian because there was no other way to reject Biden-Harris. I believe many folks who comprise this slice of the electorate will be disappointed with the benefits they receive from Trump's fixes, but they are not racist, xenophobic, or authoritarian. And Democrats should not hunker down and shrug off their concerns. We should figure out how to win back this segment of working and middle class voters who are unhappy with the Biden-Harris administration.
I wasn't pleased with the way I expressed myself yesterday. Instead of revising my remarks, I've offered this introduction to clarify my point of view.]
Original post:
Donald Trump has just won the presidency for a second time. The man is as crooked as a dog's leg. Determined to avoid the Loser label, this prodigious liar with a fragile ego crafted the Big Lie and repeated it for four years. It has become gospel for his followers. Add to this that the Republican chief is a wannabe autocrat. He idolizes strongmen on the world stage and eats up their flattery. Because he can't focus beyond self and is broadly ignorant of policy details and strategic principles, he will sacrifice American interests for nothing of value to the nation.
He hurled authoritarian rhetoric we've never heard before from a president or major party candidate for president. He has threatened his opponents, vilified women who have displeased him (especially black women) and vulnerable minorities (especially immigrants from what he has deemed "shit-hole countries), glorified violence and instigated it. With his invocations of "the enemy from within," directed at political opponents, and threats to employ the national guard and the U.S. military to go after them, he has trod ground singularly damaging to the Constitution and rule of law. He poses a clear danger to our democracy.
How did this man win an election in 2024?
Political scientists and commentators, politicians and Democratic advocates from every ideological corner, among others will be debating this election for years. While most of the hard evidence has yet to be reviewed and analyzed, I'm going to offer a quick and dirty take on things. I'm no authority, but I've followed political campaigns for decades. So ("among others"), I'll offer my view:
The highest inflation in generations and presidential favorability in the high-30s were two headwinds that Kamala Harris could not overcome. She was bound to the unpopular incumbent. This was a change election, as we've seen take place on several continents (as David Dayen notes): "Every incumbent party around the world when the post-pandemic inflation began has lost, regardless of ideology and regardless of where inflation was at the moment of the election."
In 2024 in the United States, Trump was the change candidate.
Let's add a point of context, courtesy of Bernie Sanders, who while outside the Democratic Party is among the advocates trying to push it in a direction that he favors. Set the ideological dispute aside, the senator correctly observes: 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck and there has never been a greater chasm between the richest of us and the poorest.
In other words: It's the economy, stupid. The economy was issue number one. Lots of folks are struggling and frustrated.
Consider the universe of voters in the 2024 majority.
A broad range of reasons and passions prompt people, and democratic majorities, to vote as they do.
- Every racist, sexist, misogynist and xenophobe in the country knew which candidate was theirs.
- Every evangelical, who regards white men as being entitled to dominion over all things, and especially those who have succumbed to the idolatry of Trump, felt certain of which candidate to back. So too the white nationalists, whether Christian or heathen.
- Billionaires, including many former Democrats and those who previously backed liberal or even progressive causes, understood which candidate would support policies to make them richer.
- GOP 'leaders' -- Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, Mike Johnson, et al. ... -- who saw a path to power were certain who to back.
- Scads of traditional Republicans (who may have tut-tutted some of Trump's language) are loyal to the GOP and followed their party leaders to embrace Trump.
- The audience dedicated to Fox News Channel -- which distorts the facts, offers hyperbolic coverage, and (most critically of all) buries inconvenient truths -- identified its candidate.
For few of these folks is democracy top of mind. Some yearn for an undemocratic regime led by a strongman with views that they embrace. They'll happily trade that for democratic rule. Others don't object to democracy, but unhesitatingly opt for party (and power and ambition) over country.
But most Trump voters give scarcely a thought to democratic guardrails. That just doesn't come up. (Or character for that matter.)
The bottom line:
This list (from racists to FNC fans) does not yet constitute a 52-percent majority. There are working class and middle class folks, not caught up in culture wars or bigotry or stuck in an ideological bubble, who mostly don't spend a lot of time reflecting on politics or campaigns or democracy. Those folks pushed Trump over the top.
They're unhappy. They were offered a binary choice -- Trump or not-Trump. And they chose Trump because he was the change candidate.
Trump is contemptible. Not the American electorate.
Majorities change in democracies. The Democratic candidate lost in 2024. Democrats are about to become the loyal opposition. Job number one for Trump will be to extend the 2016 tax hikes, never mind the welfare of the struggling folks who put him over the top. Democrats must offer an alternative vision. Additionally Democrats (as the only small-d democratic party) have a special duty to defend the Constitution, the rule of law, and our freedom and rights as Americans. We have watched MAGA Republicans trample over the guardrails of democracy. Democrats must push back against authoritarianism.
We'll anticipate elections in 2026 and 2028. Majorities change.